3.9.09

Shob Charitra Kalponik: The lost poem in the jungle

Javed Akhtar made a very pertinent point the other day. He asked if filmmakers get technically better with every movie, why do their films get worse? He answered it himself... because his passion drops proportionately. Now, there has been this big question in Calcutta, among those who still watch Bengali films, is whether Rituparno Ghosh's passion is gone.
There are reasons for this. When Ritu-da started out with films like Unishe April and Dohon, he could instantly connect to the ladies of the house. They could relate to his language, both the spoken one and the cinematic one. It became a ritual for them to catch the new Rituparno Ghosh film. And ladies usually don't go alone. So the men joined and they also liked what they saw. Rituparno Ghosh became a brand name which reached its zenith with Chokher Bali.
Antar Mahal, which Ritu-da called his most personal film, created the first tremors. There were quite a few scenes of rough sex in the film and coming from him it was blasphemy. Antar Mahal created more tension in Calcutta than Antichrist did in Cannes. He was billed as Ritu-porno and suddenly an entire section of his audience shut him down. Just like that.
Since then Ritu-da has tried to reach out. Like any sensible director, he wanted his audience back. But the road has been uneasy. Dosar, for all its brilliance, stopped short somewhere, too much was made of the colour of the film — black-and-white. Khela was his all-out attempt to bring in the audiences. Some did, some didn't. Not all those who did, liked the dilution. And finally came The Last Lear. The English kept the audiences away; it must have been Bachchan's worst opening ever.
Now comes Shob Charitra Kalponik. And interestingly, for the first time, Ritu-da himself is sure that people won't like it. And thankfully, he has again gone wrong with his audience assessment.
Shob Charitra... is Ritu-da's Slumdog Millionaire. Just like Simon Beaufoy-Danny Boyle used the quiz show answers as a device to dig into the past and create a tapestry of images culled from the boy's life, Ritu-da uses the subjects of a dead husband's poems for the wife to go back to his inspirations. Characters, objects, locations, which absolutely held no meaning to the woman back then suddenly waltz around her mindscape to create the portrait of a man, she now wants to love.
And if Half One churns the past, Half Two stirs the surreal. The unseen muse of the dead poet emerges from thin air, merges with the wife and becomes one. She realises she has always been the one. The dead husband himself drifts in and out of of the wife's consciousness and sometimes appears as the platonic lover. That lover is again a fan of the poet and his bonding to his words is as strong as the pull towards this lonely wife.
Ritu-da wrote the script of Shob Charitra more than a decade back. I seriously doubt had he shot this film then, whether he could have actualised the scope of the script. Because in the past few years, he has become such a mature visualiser. Just because his wordplay remains as strong, there is a tendency to overlook his images or to just compliment the cinematographer for those shots.
If you manage to catch Shob Charitra, watch the way Ritu-da shoots a poem. Just like Ritwick Ghatak used to shoot trees. It's hypnotic. Joy Goswami reciting a poem and you can't take your eyes off the screen even if it's just an aural experience. Then the way he uses Prosenjit's photo... I can't remember a still frame used better in a motion picture. Or the way the first half fades in and fades out but half two whites out and whites in.
He's of course been a brilliant director of actors. So many actors across the country have produced their best work in a Rituparno Ghosh film. And it's not a coincidence. Watch Jisshu Sengupta in Shob Charitra and you will know why. Bipasha... well, it's an idea gone wrong. Ritu-da has always accepted using stars to pull in more people. So here is Bipasha, full marks for effort, a few less for execution. And it's pretty obvious all the English lines in the film were written with her in mind and it's unfortunate she couldn't dub her own lines.
But some films rise above shortcomings. Shob Charitra... is one of them. It's a pure cinematic experience and you can't say the same about all of Rituparno's films. Watch it at a theatre where people respect cinema and don't walk in for the cheese popcorn. Because human tendency is to join the herd and smudge out individual viewpoints. The film is not as intellectual or 'antel' as people are making it out to be. It's a simple poem lost in a jungle. You have to make the effort and find it.

29 comments:

  1. The film is simply brilliant. Agree to your views. Though I haven't watched Dosar yet, but this is undoubtedly Prosenjit's best performance till date. Though there were sexual innuendos galore in Antarmahal, it wasn't a great film; except the squeaking sound of the bed, noithing much was remembered by the audience. Rituparno Ghosh has indeed made a film which deserves a second viewing.

    Lastly would have to say this that this review of yours should have been in the papers.

    Sreeraj Mitra

    ReplyDelete
  2. U'r review sounds really nice but am skeptical of his films, had hated Raincoat but liked Antar Mahal. Will try catching this one on u tube. Never saw the others that made him a cult unfortunately!
    Will also watch this for the quintessential 'antel' experience--getting nostalgic about calcutta in cambridge!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sreeraj babu, thank you! Anek din por Ritu-da in full flow! Darun legechhe... :)

    p.s. Anonymous here is Richa Bansal from Cambridge... too lazy to sign in with her google account!

    ReplyDelete
  4. well..Is SCK Rituda's SM?? may be..but yes, the treatment of the subject is really good..after last couple of failures,people also didn't expect much from SCK.And this is why SCK finally emerges as one of the best hits of Rituda..Joy Goswami's poetry had a big role to play in it.Prosenjit rocked but Bipasha amazed me, again this is indeed Rituda's masterstroke to fit Bips into that role.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. if one doesnt know anything about surrealism the film sail above their head and tehy will derive many kinds of interpretations about the film viz its an aatel film, nira is another woman who prosenjit used to love etc but he fact is sob choritro kalponik is a masterpiece and people need to understand that in the second half bipasha basu who fals in love with her husbadns poetry - her sub -conscious mind is depicted. the way rituparno has used tagores poem in the last scene is marvellous.the entire film has the rituparno touch in dialogues-as "gochano"and crisp as ever.........this film surely marks hsi maturity..........sohag sens perforamnc stands out among all oteh rgood performances. the majorflaw i found in thsi film is teh irritating dubbing for bipasha basu

    ReplyDelete
  6. If people shut out Rituparno Ghosh for 'Antar Mahal' let them be shut in their own cosy social boundaries.
    It was one of the best directed films of Bengali Cinema and Pratim has very rightly mentioned, "He's of course been a brilliant director of actors".
    Abhishekh, Jackie Shroff and Soha Ali were all brilliant and largely because of the masterful director.

    As for Javed Akhtar, I would beg to differ. Would you say the same for directors like Wong Kar-wai or say the Coen brothers?
    Mr.Akhtar was merely refering to the commercial directors of Bollywood cinema who after filling up their coffers would eventually get more interested in politics and other stuff than films.
    I am sure Rituparna Ghosh does not fall into this category and we will still be blessed with many non-commercial yet powerful masterpieces.

    ReplyDelete
  7. jit, i really liked sohag sen... terrific body language... i am not a bangal, so if there was any slip, it didn't bother me... but i have heard other people being really annoyed by it...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ifte, Javed saab was talking about the majority... Even if you look at Wong Kar Wai, the general perception is that from In the Mood for Love to My Blueberry Nights, the road has been downhill... You may not agree, I may not agree but that's the perception. Even Ray made Pather Panchali up front and then the rest... So there may be a point in there...

    ReplyDelete
  9. i agree to an extet with javed saab and i second pratim das thoughts...........actually there is a phsychology behind it...... teh first few films of a direcotr in most of the times turns out to be his best coz of teh passiona dn zeal he puts in to establish himself first.look at rituparnos first film - hirer angti . to me its one of his finest films

    ReplyDelete
  10. perhaps it boils down to an exponentially increasing self-consciousness. in the first (few) film(s) a director is not too conscious of the craft, and focuses emotional energy into telling the story as truly as possibly. with more exposure to the film making process, a sometimes clumsy awareness of all that can be done with the medium creeps in. and the truth of the story starts to be driven by the technique, rather than the other way round. explains the dip in the graph then i guess. but then again for every wong kar wai going down there has been an alejandro innaritu soaring upwards.

    ReplyDelete
  11. yes devashish... some can keep it up, some lose it on the way... then again only passion cannot lead you anywhere... dev anand can vouch for that!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Very nice review as usual Pratim da. I have been a reader of your reviews for a long time now. You don't know me, I am a friend of Ritchik, we are in the same class in college. Looking forward to more of your reviews here

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks Truth and Lies... Hope that comment was a truth and not a lie! So what all do all of you like to read here on my blog? Let me know!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well I was hoping you could post info on films that you haven't reviewed for the paper. We could get a good idea of which films to watch surely. There must be lots of such films.
    And BTW, my name is Somak.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ritwik Ghatak spelling bhul........

    ReplyDelete
  16. btw....it was me sulakshana

    ReplyDelete
  17. Pratim I wasn't sure I will watch the movie till I read your review. I am quite impressed by your more poetic and mellow romantic self. This is your first blog that I have read so far and hate to admit but I like your blogs better. Very different you from the t2 you. More thawed yet vulnerable, mature yet moody. Keep it up wove Ipshita

    ReplyDelete
  18. yes ipsita, one is about sex and the other is about making love...

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I AM A SERIOUSLY VIEWING WORLD CINEMA AND ALSO STUDYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ABOUT A QUARTER OF A CENTURY.

    I HAVE BEEN VIEWING THE BEST OF GERMAN,ITALIAN,FRENCH,ENGLISH,BENGALI AND INDIAN CINEMA BY THE MAESTROS ANALYSING AND MAKING NOTES AND RECORDING MY UNDERSTANDINGS YEAR AFTER YEAR FOR 25 YEARS.

    RITUPORNO'S FILMS SO FAR DID NOT OCCUPY MY MINDSCAPE THE WAY A MAESTRO DOES WHERE HIS WORKS OF ART KEEP WORKING INSIDE THE CONSCIOUSNESS SILENTLY FOR EVER.

    THIS IS THE MOVIE IN WHICH RITUPORNO CROSSED THE THRESHHOLD AND FOR THE FIRST TIME CREATED A WORK OF ART THAT CAN BE CALLED TRULY THAT BY A MAESTRO.

    HE HAS SUCCESFULLY CREATED A POETRY ON THE CELLULOID THAT CANNOT BE FORGOTTEN. THE FILM HAS CREATED NEW IDIOMS FOR THE CINEMA OF THE WORLD THAT SHALL BE RECOGNISED BY THE WORLD AS VERY BENGALI YET VERY UNIVERSAL.

    THE STORY ITSELF HAS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE WHOLE WORLD BODY OF LITERATURE AND ART AND EVEN SCIENCE(ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) PRESENTED VERY DEEP AND ABSOLUTELY RARE INSIGHTS ABOUT THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE HUMAN MIND AND ITS INTERACTIONS WITH THE UNIVERSE.

    HAVING KNOWN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE I KNOW THAT ROBOTS CANNOT IMAGINE.

    ONLY HUMANS CAN IMAGINE AND CREATE IMAGINARY CHARACTERS.

    THIS POWER OF IMAGINATION HAS MADE US HUMANS THE WAY WE ARE TODAY THE CREATORS OF CULTURAL CIVILISATIONS.

    THE STORY OF A MIND OF A LIVING WOMAN FALLING IN LOVE WITH THE MIND OF A DEAD MAN IMAGINING IT TO BE ALIVE HAS NOT BEEN TOLD BY ANYONE WITH SUCH POIGNANCY BEFORE IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MANKIND.

    "SHOB CHARITRO KALPONIK" THEREFORE DESERVES TO BE PREMIERED BEFORE THE WORLD'S MAESTROS OF CINEMA EXCLUSIVELY FOR PROPER EVALUATION OF THIS GREAT WORK OF ART.

    THE HUMAN HERITAGE DESERVES TO SEE THIS STORY.

    ReplyDelete
  22. BHALO LEGECHHE...tobe shobai bojhar moto kokhonoi na...joy goswamir recitation oshadharon chhilo...rituporno da khubi jotno niye film ti baniyechhen...............

    ReplyDelete
  23. "THE HUMAN HERITAGE DESERVES TO SEE THIS STORY."

    what does this mean, the undefeated river?

    ReplyDelete
  24. THE HUMAN HERITAGE IS OUR COLLECTIVE MEMORY OF THE CULTURAL CIVILISATION.

    THIS STORY DESERVES TO BE PRESERVED FOR POSTERITY SO THAT WE DO NOT FORGET HOW TO CREATE PATTERNS OF THOUGHTS THAT LEAD TO PICTURES AND MUSIC OF POETIC NATURE.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. THE PATTERNS OF THOUGHTS CREATED BY RITUPORNO IN THIS STORY ARE UNIQUE.
    IT REVEALED HOW A MALE POETIC MIND PERCEIVES THE WORLD AND ALSO HOW A FEMALE MUSE-MIND RESPONDS TO IT.

    IN THIS PERCEPTION AND RECEPTION ARE HIDDEN THE GOD'S SECRETS OF UNIQUENESS OF A HUMAN BRAIN.

    NO MATTER WHAT WE DO WE CANNOT CREATE A WORLD OF ROBOTS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WHERE MINDS WILL BE SELF-WILLED,IMAGINATIVE,INTUITIVE,CREATIVE AND PERCEPTIVELY RESPONSIVE TO SURREALITIES.

    THE SOONER THE HUMAN HERITAGE UNDERSTANDS THIS THE SOONER IT WILL RETURN ITS CIVILISATION FROM ITS INDUSTRIAL ASPIRATIONS TO CULTURAL TRADITIONS
    AND THE HUMANITY WILL RETURN TO ITS STATE OF NATURE THAT IS WHY THE HUMAN HERITAGE NEEDS TO CAREFULLY PRESERVE THIS STORY FOR THE FUTURE PROGENY.

    ReplyDelete